Bernini's "Ecstasy of St. Teresa"Having just marked my 40th birthday – a good excuse for celebration and totally non-stressful I’m happy to say – I’ve been reflecting on the obvious issues of body, youth, age, fitness, sex and all that stuff that starts coming to a head long about the time that a woman realizes she is now, finally and absolutely, much more than her mother told her she was. Unless of course her mother was an exceptionally self-aware advocate of women’s body liberation and that is exceedingly rare.
I’ve met accomplished women, self identifying feminists, who are every bit as uptight and domineering over their daughters as the conservatives they love to hate. For better or worse, the politics of women’s sexuality are more tangled, charged, loaded and – for some – frightening, than the politics of women’s lib and almost any other aspect of life. Your mom might wave the flag for equal pay, but mention equal access to safe sex and she’s likely to blow a gasket. And you can forget about discussing this stuff at church.
Who knew? Well a lot of women it turns out, and some of them write books now. Some of them run stores that sell things that buzz and pulse and smell like mango. Some of them home school children and cook sensuously beautiful food. Some run clinics where teaching women how to be unafraid – of themselves, of life – is the mission. Some make films. Some make babies. Yet with all these women out there knowing these things to be true, we still talk fairly little about the subject. And we only rarely bring it into discussion in the context of parenting. But there, in truth, is where the rubber hits the road. Pun absolutely intended I’m afraid. A woman first learns how she may, or may not, express herself in this world watching her mother support, inhibit, celebrate or denigrate her daughter’s transformation from girl to woman.
For better or worse, this process is intimately related to a woman’s spiritual identity. Seriously, it is. This is not an excuse for two-dimensional goddess rant. Men experience something similar, I think, in modeling their fathers or resisting them. But I can’t say how that relates to their connecting to the numinous. I welcome their input. Who taught by example in your life and who taught you through partnership? The straight men I’ve talked to about this say it was a girlfriend or wife who helped them “connect.” And for those whose mothers were, themselves, uptight or unhappy in their own sexual selves, their lives are too often full of escape and hiding behavior. Drugs, alcohol, false identities at work or school, relationships with girls who fit the Madonna/whore cliché. The man who marries the one and seeks the other on the side. Fortunately, it’s not a life sentence. Some find their way out.
For women certainly, there is an underground tunnel running between the deepest wells in her life – an elemental connectedness between how she relates to her body and how she relates to all things divine and transcendental in the universe. Plug up her access to the first and you might as well close down the second.
Which is why we should be discussing people’s sexuality - women’s sexuality in particular - in church, probably. Or maybe just on Tuesday nights or something – a young women’s discussion group at 5:00pm, and a mature (21+) women’s group at 7:00. But you try bringing that subject up in any church you know... Can you imagine?
I can see it now, approaching the patriarch of the regional Orthodox church. He’s based in Los Angeles I think. He’d think I was mad. Or worse, an ecumenically inclined wiccan or something. Either way I’d be politely invited to shop elsewhere.
The oldest Russian Orthodox church in the contiguous United States is just steps from my house. Anything in America with roots older than your living relatives is impressive. But this church is especially so. It’s a small and terribly pretty little building, full of new members, people fleeing from the Roman Catholic and American Church of England. The bells there, saved from disasters in St. Petersburg in the 1920s, ring a hauntingly beautiful song across the city hills, on Friday evening and Saturday evening, and Sunday morning at 10:00 a.m. They sound like nothing else – very Eastern, if you can imagine. Like Balinese gamelan music.
The Eastern Church is a poetic, jewel-encrusted, mystic and life affirming celebration of humanity’s relationship to the Divine. They don’t mess about. While much of their philosophical tradition is, according to common understanding “negatively defined” meaning they conceptualize God and the Holy Spirit by what he is not, in practice they spend a great deal of time celebrating earthly manifestations of grace, beauty and the “Divine Feminine.”
Still, with all the bells and the smells, most Eastern Orthodox expounders are very conservative on matters relating to sexuality, which is a shame. If any of the major religions has a liturgical claim to celebrate the spiritual significance of womanhood, it’s the Eastern Orthodox. For them, the mother of God, Mary, is nearly as central a figure as Christ and the Holy Spirit. Alas, in spite of a poetic tradition that is, at times, overwhelmingly sensual, even sexual, they clearly espouse a conservative agenda. Sex is for marriage and making babies. It’s an opportunity lost, I’m afraid.
That leaves Sophia, and Mary Magdalene, and every woman who wants her church NOT to repeat the sins of our mothers – may God be gentle with her – looking for a spiritual home. The Gnostic traditions (plural intentional) appear to flower in this direction. We can see the bud turning towards the sun here, instead of away. Or perhaps I should say the moon. One hopes the Gnostic Ecclesia will include a field of “moon flowers,” rooted deeply in this earth, but with faces turned to the moon and the stars for inspiration.
That’s the purpose of this blog, I think. To plant more of those seeds. To encourage a connection for women seekers and to celebrate the men who support this path. To bring out the Divine Feminine in both literal and numinous aspects, for men and for women. Perhaps, one day, to bring the subject of sexuality – women’s AND men’s – firmly back into the sphere where it belongs – into the bosom of the church where we can treat it with dignity, irreverence, playfulness, poetry and comedy. This is my hope. It won’t be the first windmill I’ve tilted at in life.

6 comments:
For women certainly, there is an underground tunnel running between the deepest wells in her life – an elemental connectedness between how she relates to her body and how she relates to all things divine and transcendental in the universe. Plug up her access to the first and you might as well close down the second.
This is so true. And your description is clear and thought provoking. I'm going to mull this over for a while.
My first reaction is to say that growing up in a fundamentalist Christian tradition where women were seen as inherently bad (with the story Eve and her responsibility for the fall of mankind), I've seen at least one place where that disconnect is actively nurtured.
I'm a big believer in small beginnings. Trying to affect change within my little sphere of influence. I'm trying my best to teach my daughter something different than what I was taught--through my words and my actions, I hope.
I'm really glad your tilting at this windmill, and I'm looking forward to hearing what you and others have to say about this topic.
You are a rather fantastic writer and thinker. I am very appreciative you decided to Blog yourself.
Cheerfully, ROK
Roger, Kimberly: To both of you, thank you for your energy and support. I'm so delighted to have touched a nerve and inspired more thinking.
And for the record, Roger et al., this mostly independent woman loves to hear from men just as much as from women so please don't hold back.
And remember, I'm not "on" everyday. Some of my stuff's gonna be crappy - I'm only human! :)
xxx
Juliana
hmmm... Somehow my comment got lost in the aether... Here 'goes again...
The difficulty in reconciling sexuality with spirituality is that we are victims of our own perceptions. In my own quest to reconcile these two aspects of being, I have found Ibn al-’Arabi’s description of the Divine quite useful:
“…It has no qualities because it has all qualities.”
The Divine doesn’t have the physical or psychological attributes that we do – no ego, no gender. In our attempts to understand it, we assign human attributes to the manifestations of it that we can perceive. Femininity and masculinity are not inherent aspects of the Divine, they are descriptions we use to understand it. When we experience the nurturing or wisdom manifestations or emanations of the Divine, it reminds us of the maternal attributes we usually equate with women. Likewise the dominant or forceful experiences remind us of attributes we usually assign to men. The Divine doesn’t have gender or sexual issues - these issues come about when our use of gender in describing the Divine becomes dysfunctional. To describe the Divine solely as a matriarchal ‘goddess’ is as counterproductive as the orthodox concept of a patriarchal ‘god’. This is not to say that the archetypal usage of gender isn’t useful. On the contrary it can be one of the most powerful tools we have in understanding it. It’s when we fall into the trap of taking our archetypes to literally that the problems arise.
IMHO the way to begin reconciling our inherent sexual instincts with our inherent quest to reintegrate with the Divine is to work at being more in touch with the androgynous ‘Divine Spark’ within us. The more acquainted we are with the Divine within us the more functional we become, not only sexually but in all the aspects of our lives.
Padre! Glad you're back. You've been very quiet.
Hmm, well:
“…It has no qualities because it has all qualities.”
This is a beautiful phrase, and conceptually in line with my understanding also, but it doesn't jive with how you expand on the thought...
Femininity and masculinity are not inherent aspects of the Divine, they are descriptions we use to understand it.
Well I agree, God isn't male of female EXCLUSIVELY, or in any human iteration. But your ibn al'Arabi states that "it has all qualities."
Which I take to mean that, indeed, femininity and masculinity (and all the other words that English uses to allude to these concepts METAPHORICALLY), in fact ARE part of "God," just not so exclusively.
I like the metaphor of white and black. One, white, is the reflection of all colors - you might say its "purity" is derived from rejecting any distinction created by any one, or combination of, other "colors." The Divine is white, certainly - undefined.
But ibn al'Arabi's phrase can also render the Divine Black - the absorbtion and inclusion of all colors. The Diving is black, certainly, encompassing the whole.
Personally I am unable to accept a literal translation of the demiurge metaphor. The illusion, the Maya, the "suchness" that dances beneath man, woman, bad and good, is all in some respect or other connected to the Divine.
Even evil - whatever the hell it actually is - is connected in so far as it might be defined by "distance from connectedness."
Ok, end of abstract discussion!
God isn't male. God isn't female (we agree on this obviously). Neither is God "neuter" or androgynous - exclusivly. All these things are God, in part. None, in whole.
I find poetry in the process of navigating between the definitions we live with. False definitions very often, to be sure. But how we dance, with man and woman and androgyn, is music to me.
We dance in shadow. In light. We get lost in one, blinded by the other.
You are right to insist that I recognize the equal ability of the "born man" or "born not woman" to connect with the Divine. So acknowledged.
I will explore that them also. Just off the cuff I recall very strongly my "waking" post and the man who inspired it. He was, I think a "chalice of woman's wisdom" or something.
The better way to describe him would be with non-exclusively female terms, however: Receptive, Intuitive, Moon, Shadow, Depth... and in fact he was also Expressive, Sun, Light, Explosive, Forceful and Powerful.
No man is exclusively one or the other. No woman either. But I find wisdom and poetry in watching how these qualities play out in our lives.
Sex is just theater, after all. The play's the thing. We can do Othello as either "straight" drama or, conceivably, as burlesque or strip tease or...
Take your pick. :)
hi, I love your blog, it says so much to me about what i need to look at and develop, i would love to dialogue more with you if its ok. thanks
Post a Comment